|
Many
thanks to - David Cross - Lawerence Jones
Diversity Abundance
I
a
paradigm shift, shifting the paradigm
a look at the effects from the abundance of postmodernity
on diversity
 |
‘Wallace
later recalled the "fever-heat of expectation he felt".
"On my first walk into the forest I looked about, expecting
to see monkeys as plentiful as zoological gardens,
with humming –birds and parrots in profusion." But after several
days of seeing no monkeys and hardly any birds, he "began
to think that these and other productions of the South American
forests are much scarcer than they are represented to be by
travellers". Any one who has stepped into a rainforest, head
full of images from glossy nature photography, has had roughly
the same disappointment, which derives from confusing diversity
with abundance. ’1
|
 |
In
a different context, Louis Menand in his text ‘Diversity’,
in Critical Terms for Literary Study, states ‘Diversity is
one of the problems of modernity," and much of his text is
centered round the issues of multiculturalism and the growing
awareness and importance of this from the 1960s. He discusses
the Harvard report and mentions how the authors consider ‘diversity
exclusively as a socio-economic phenomenon, a consequence
of the natural inequalities of aptitude’. 2
He consequence of group mixing, not group separation’.
3 He then concludes that through
the continues, by arguing that ‘what has happened to American
life since the mid-1980s is a cultural phenomenon which is
the commercial mass media a "common culture" has emerged.
and he then states, ‘ The deeper difficulty is that diversity
is a paradox; the more attention you pay it, the more quickly
it disappears’. 4 |
 |
Globalization
If
diversity is explicit in modernity in its catch-cry to "make
it new" and (make it different), then perhaps abundance is
implicit in postmodernity and perhaps this abundance is a
signifier of the emergence of a "common culture" (globalization)
that Menand talks of. |
 |
For
it is a culture where mass-media, universal marketing and digitization
have created universal codes that are often self-cloning and
that have continued permeating economics, science and the arts
with such a degree that it has implications for diversity. A
range of economic aspects, such as the rise of multinational
corporations and economic super powers, and a shift from an
economy based on production to one based on consumption are
often held to be hallmarks of postmodernity. Through economic
globalization, multinational
corporations have used aggressive marketing, advertising, and
mass media to monopolize a growing market share with abundance
but not necessarily diversity. |
 |
|
|